What set Sayers apart was her solution. Schools, she urged, ought to adopt “the mediaeval scheme of education…what the men of the Middle Ages supposed to be the object and the right order of the educative process.” At the heart of classical education is the Trivium, whose three parts are Grammar, Dialectic, and Rhetoric, in that order. Intended for the study of Latin, they actually instruct pupils in the process of learning. First, one learns the structure of language, grammar (hence, grammar school) “what it was, how it was put together, and how it worked.” Then dialectic, how to use language, make accurate statements, construct an argument and detect fallacies in argument. Finally, the pupil learns rhetoric, how to use language elegantly and persuasively. These steps—acquiring the building blocks of knowledge, analyzing how they are used, and constructing something beautiful and true from them—apply to all fields of study, not just language.
I've got more over on my education blog.
And here is the St. Crispin's Day speech from Shakespeare's Henry V.
3 comments:
great post. Imagine what education could be without the bureaucratic constraints!
I also like how the education is deliberately Aristotelian. We neglect Aristotle to our great loss.
I take it you've run into the various books (mostly homeschooling related) which seek to flesh Sayers' essay out into a curriculum, such as The Well Trained Mind and Designing Your Own Classical Curriculum.
Post a Comment