10.07.2008

thoughts on homeschooling

I am undecided on the question of homeschooling. But I'm very much interested in it because God willing I will be a father someday. Reading First Things today, I find an article that speaks to one mother and father's experience. They write of being more or less forced into homeschooling because of the deficiencies of the current educational fancies operating in American schools. In the process, they articulate what sounds to me like a very appealing educational philosophy:
Home education as the Millmans understand it is about offering children a level of moral and intellectual agency that a school setting cannot provide. “For us,” they write, “education means a kind of growth and development that seems to have no constituency within the school system.” Though they don’t belabor their Christian identity, the very language they use—truth, virtue, freedom—is a vocabulary too mined with a given set of values to be of use even, it increasingly seems, in private schools where egalitarian ideals and “who-are-we-to-judge-ism” are offered as a counterweight to upper-class guilt. Even to think about ideas like truth, virtue, and freedom in large terms is to step outside the institutional conversation, with its overriding concern for what can be quantified. By contrast, in homeschooling, “what matters is not getting the child to produce work but, rather, getting the child to become a fully free and actualized human being.” If homeschooling represents an assertion of the parental right to influence how a child perceives reality, in the Millmans’ view the real point of this kind of education is to develop a person with the clarity to discern what is real. Learning, then, is less about amassing a certain body of knowledge than about cultivating the habit of asking questions and seeking true answers.
This idea, that education should be both moral and oriented to the truth is not a new one. Before John Dewey's educational pragmatism really took hold in American schools, this philosophy of education being about virtue and truth was dominant. It really is unfortunate that we've replaced Aristotle with Dewey, and I think it is a good thing that homeschoolers can correct for this mistake made by the teachers of our teachers.

The only objection I have to homeschooling concerns the natural socialization that occurs in a school environment. This involves, I think, not just learning social norms from peers, but also from sources of authority that are not mommy or daddy. I think this is an essential element of education that I am not sure homeschooling can provide, at least in the same capacity and extent.

Obviously this critique is more or less effective depending on the style employed by the parents who choose to homeschool. Some homeschooling students will find themselves ever occupied with social activities and challenges. There are also a large number of homeschooling organizations that are providing the types of activities that may be difficult for homeschoolers to get involved in otherwise.

Basically I think homeschooling is not the ideal. It's something we do when we're desperate, because the education system is so bad.

11 comments:

Ol' Blue said...

great post. i look forward to reading the article. My parents decided to homeschool my three brothers and I. I started attending "regular" school in 4th grade, my older brother never went at all, and my two younger brothers started in middle school. I wouldn't trade the homeschooling experience for anything. I also went to private school and public school, and enjoyed them both. I reject the idea that homeschooling is not the ideal. It certainly isn't always the ideal, but sometimes it is.

Zach said...

which elicits the question, is such there such a thing that can be described as the ideal educational environment

or is it too dependent on circumstances to speak categorically about.

i tend to think there is an ideal setting that can be described. it may look different in varying conditions, but it is the probably the same in essence

or maybe that makes no sense, i'm not sure.

Odysseus said...

I disagree. I think homeschooling is the ideal. The family is a much more natural setting than a school. In fact, aschool absolutely does not represent reality in any way and I dare someone to explain how their school environment ever prepared them for "real life". Sure, learning prepared you, but how does an environment composed entirely of people your age (escept for the despot we call a teacher) in any way resemble the workplace?

My older kids are now in a private Catholic school that I helped start a few years ago (I was principal the first year before leaving the profession for business), but I will probably homeschool them through high school (unless I found a private high school!) and I look forward to it. If I am lucky, my younger boys (2 and 1) will never see the inside of a school.

Keep in mind, I was a teacher and administrator for ten years so I am not irrationally prejudiced against school teachers. I think I was a damn fine one, but that doesn't change my view of the "naturalness" of school. (Some people are good at combat too, but they still think war is a bad idea.)

Unknown said...

I agree with Rob

Zach said...

hmm

still not sure what to think.

thanks for the comments guys

Odysseus said...

What?

Somebody agrees with me?

I have to tell my wife this!

CMinor said...

I think it can be an ideal situation, but there is a point (somewhere around the preteen years) at which the student has to willingly take some degree of ownership of his/her education. If it doesn't happen or is resisted, it soon becomes a waste of the parent's time (also the kid's.)

Christopher Blosser said...

I was homeschooled from 5th grade through 12th and my brothers until high school, except for the youngest (I have 4) who was public all the way.

The key motivation was the poor quality of the elementary school in the town we moved (Hickory, NC) at the time.

As with anything, the success of a 'home school' environment is contingent on what everybody ("teachers" and "students" put into it). Of course we were required to take the standardized tests by the state to ensure we were "keeping up" with the rest of the kids.

The only objection I have to homeschooling concerns the natural socialization that occurs in a school environment. This involves, I think, not just learning social norms from peers, but also from sources of authority that are not mommy or daddy. I think this is an essential element of education that I am not sure homeschooling can provide, at least in the same capacity and extent.

I agree -- and this would be the biggest criticism of home-schooling. But there are ways to offset the lack of "socialization" that regular school provides. We had a large home-schooling community in our city so families would meet together regularly for field trips (we learned civics from a local judge; biology and physics from an employee of the local science center) -- likewise our Baptist Church had a strong youth group that met during the week (not to mention a Boy Scout Troop; activities at the local library, et al.).

there is a point (somewhere around the preteen years) at which the student has to willingly take some degree of ownership of his/her education. If it doesn't happen or is resisted, it soon becomes a waste of the parent's time (also the kid's.)

Very true -- home school does require a degree of self-reliance as well. We probably had significantly more freedom to do what we want (so long as we turned in our assignments at the end of the day) and to pursue our own interests. But I imagine high school as well involves "taking ownership of one's education" to some extent. Nothing prohibited my friends from cutting class if they wanted to -- that's one thing you simply can't do if you're home-schooled. ;-)

Odysseus said...

Some people, for all sorts of reasons, will never be able to homeschool. So we always have the duty as Catholcis to build schools. But as long as one parent has at least a high school education (they don't need a college degree to do it well, though any parent will have the equivalent of s degree by the time they finish teaching their children!) and has the opportunity, their child should be home-educated. 'Socialization' (The good kind, not the kind at school where you learn about drugs and pornography from friends and teachers) can occur at soccer practice, music lessons, etc.

Socialization is actually supposed to happen outside school anyway. As a teacher, I never believed I was there to "facilitate socialization", though this earned me some enemies.

Darwin said...

I keep meaning to write a substantive comment, but since I haven't yet, here are my and MrsDarwin's posts about our homeschooling experiences (if you haven't already seen them):

http://darwincatholic.blogspot.com/2007/02/where-im-coming-from.html

http://darwincatholic.blogspot.com/2007/02/in-which-darwin-describes-his.html

Zach said...

Thank you all for the thoughts. I am perhaps too critical of homeschooling. I think it is clear that if homeschooling is done right, it is a very good thing indeed. It is also clear that every method of education will have its pros and cons.